Study Shows Up To 85% Tainted Donor Blood Contains Spike Protein Antibodies

Subscribe to my weekly newsletter, and never miss an article, by clicking here!

If you think COVID-19 is pretty much over and done with, you need to stop believing your lying eyes and reckless intuition. Just because you aren’t seeing or hearing of people dropping dead from COVID-19 en masse, it doesn’t mean you should ever stop living life cowering in fear of the ever-present SARS-CoV-2. Never stop living in fear.

Just kidding—that likely sounds stupid to everyone who is going about their normal life, the way they did pre-pandemic, as it should, because that would be a ridiculous and depressing way to go about life.

Nevertheless, I am regrettably the bearer of news that may leave some folks fearful when it comes to receiving an emergency blood transfusion from a well-meaning vaccinated donor.

This breakdown dives into antibodies, antigens, immunity, and the revelation that donor blood used in transfusions, among other reasons, is now more than likely tainted with the vaccinated donor’s Spike protein antibodies that have unknown adverse effects on the unvaccinated receiver of the transfusion upon entering the new host’s bloodstream.

Fortunately, because of the spike protein antigen’s proven ability to stick around long-term, the presence of the spike antibodies to be a red flag that indicates the possible presence of the dangerous spike protein that the “vaccines” told your body to start creating via the mRNA injections. Once your body followed those instructions and began to produce the antigens on its own, it would, in turn, begin the development of spike antibodies to fight the antigens it just made.

Therefore, though the spike antibodies are not necessarily harmful themselves, they are indicative of the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antigen, which are the dangerous part of the virus [that you should be concerned about putting in your body].

According to the chart shown below from the CDC; NY, NH, VT, and ME are the only states that have various areas of “concerning community levels,” as they also claim 58% of people are known to have the ever-so-controversial Natural Immunity!

This is incredibly good news, so naturally it is not being celebrated and shared with the people in a positive, victorious message of hope, but instead it is all crickets on the “herd immunity” front. We can be sure of one thing though; if the “vaccine” works the way we were told, then the majority of the US now is 100% more immune than any Pfizer-jabbed pin cushion NPC is—with no adverse events! ☣💉☣

CDC seroprevalence estimate

Confusingly, the CDC reports over 80% of Americans are jabbed, while admitting 58% have natural immunity [where’s the media coverage?], yet vaccines are still deemed necessary to many in power and masks are still mandated in Los Angeles, CA and New York City, NY to kids as young as two-years-old, and to their detriment!

First, there was a reasonable goal of 60% for herd immunity; which suddenly turned into 60% vaccination rate to be herd immunity; a standard never before used for measurement of herd immunity. This rose to 70%, then 80%, until it simply became “enough people %.” It makes one wonder what impossible new placement of the COVID’s over goalpost is Dr. Evil—Fauci, set on now?

The thing that never ceases to blow my mind, is that on the same page as the information showing these reports is also a push to get a needle into the arm of every member of the already barely affected by COVID-19 child population; fearmongering with the threat of reinfection (still unheard of in infection-acquired immunity).

Are you still not convinced the blood used in any future emergency blood transfusions will more likely than not contain “vaccine”-acquired Spike protein antibodies, proving the blood from donation banks like American Red Cross can be assumed to be tainted with genetically modified, jabbed blood. It feels like the only two ways this could be interpreted are as reckless or plain evil.

Interestingly, a jabbed person is not considered “vaccinated” to CDC until AFTER 14 days postvax, although postvaxs deaths are MOST COMMON in the first 10ish days🤔

Why would they specifically instruct to NOT COUNT the deaths in the FATAL 2-week postvax period as vaccine-deaths?

Seroprevalence Monitoring Blood Donations

What are Antibodies?

Before diving into the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in donor blood, I want to briefly clarify what an antibody is so there isn’t confusion as you continue on. The average Joe likely has an idea of the purpose of antibodies or has heard the term before, but may not recall what they are for.

What are Antibodies?

Antibodies, or immunoglobulin, are biological molecules produced by white blood cells [B cells], which control your body’s immunity. Once your B cells have seen an enemy virus or bacteria [antigens], the antibodies will recognize and clasp onto structures inside or on the surface of the antigens, neutralizing the threat and protecting you from illness!

Your immune system contains tens of millions of B cells, and each B cell produces different antibodies that recognize their unique corresponding antigen. These B cells do not expire; your body has a lifetime collection of countless B cells that can make antibodies against whatever viruses or bacteria you have encountered in your life.

As most people have assumed all along, according to ZOE COVID Study, “when you catch a virus like SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, the B cells that produce the specific antibodies for the virus multiply rapidly, and then travel around your body to tackle the infection […] ‘memory’ B cells can remain in the body, ready to spring into action if you catch the same virus again.”

Please, use common sense when reading that article from ZOE COVID Study, as it has needlessly fearmongering positions it takes on some issues it discusses in the report. There is good information in the piece, but there are a lot of subjective opinions coming from a place of fear. 

Like the video above states, the purpose of vaccines is to generate an antibody response, traditionally this is done without the patients to suffer through illness, so the vaccinated person establishes the antibodies to battle that particular antigen. Therefore, traditionally the person inoculated is intended to now have the memory B cells to fight off those antigens in the future.

REDS Epidemiology, Surveillance, and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic (RESPONSE)

REDS-IV-P Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic [RESPONSE], is the COVID-19 extension of REDS-IV-P, which is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [NHLBI]. The RESPONSE program tested seroprevalence, the prevalence of antibodies to a pathogen (SARS-CoV-2) in a population, of blood donations.

Using REDS-IV-P’s unique access to donated blood for transfusions to become the surveyor of donor blood from major blood donation institutions such as the American Red Cross, in attempts to estimate percentages of donations containing antibodies in transfusion blood.

By testing for the nucleic antibodies and the spike protein antibodies, they can determine what percentage of each demographic [known as hubs in the program] has been infected with COVID-19 and what percentage has been injected with what they call a vaccine and retained antibodies.

Spike [S] antibodies

S antibodies
SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid [N] antibodies

N antibodies are caused naturally by an adaptive immune response against the actual virus via infection.

Fortunately for me, this was precisely the data I was looking for, and the NIH ultimately provided me with all of the horrifying information I needed to know about the unfortunate new dangers now involved, that need to also be taken into account when weighing risks in receiving life-saving blood transfusions.

In addressing acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, another part of the study is focusing on donors reporting post-donation information (PDI) consistent with COVID-19 by testing plasma from all available PDI donations for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by nucleic acid tests [NAT].

According to the REDS-IV-P COVID-19 program, “subjects who are diagnosed with COVID-19 based on PDI reports or who test positive by SARS-CoV-2 NAT on index donation plasma are being enrolled into a longitudinal follow-up study which is collecting multiple samples for nine-months to one-year post-infection.”

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia has been completed using a SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test (NAT) performed on retained blood donor minipool samples from six geographic regions in the US. 

REDS-IV-P Program

Using their open access to the blood supply and blood donors, the REDS-IV-P program began conducting the RESPONSE study (REDS-IV-P Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic) in early 2020, with stated goals to:

  • evaluate if SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in blood donations in the U.S. using an assay that could potentially be used to screen the blood supply if evidence of SARS-CoV-2 transfusion-transmission became apparent – currently this risk is theoretical,
  • conduct serosurveys using optimized assays/algorithms to monitor antibody reactivity in blood donor populations over time,
  • enroll SARS-CoV-2 positive donors and others into a longitudinal cohort study to answer fundamental questions about the evolution of viremia and immune responses, and
  • establish a sharable biorepository that includes specimens collected early on in the infection and potentially large volumes of plasma from infected/convalescent donors.
The RESPONSE study published its findings on the seroprevalence in “residual blood donation specimens” in the JAMA Network; their findings were reviewed by the CDC.

The CDC-linked JAMA study clearly shows blood banks across the nation were testing 6,000 “residual blood donation specimens” per month from 7/20-5/21, confirming a combined infection/vax-induced seroprevalence [shown via spike protein and nucleic antibodies] is found in 83% of donor blood (20% infection-induced)!

Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers in the UK

The February 2021 Oxford University study published out of the United Kingdom in the New England Journal of Medicine, Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers, concluded that, “the presence of anti-spike or anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies was associated with a substantially reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in the ensuing 6 months.”

I found this comparison of the actual NEJM study (pictured on the right) vs. a biased article about the NEJM study by Constance Wu of 2-Minute Medicine (shown on the left) to be astoundingly significant of the temperature of today’s politics in medicine.

Clearly, Ms. Wu was attempting to mislead her readers by subtly wording her summary to falsely convey a aubstantial benefit of receiving the jab by deeming the reinfection risk to be “lower” for anti-nucleocapsid IgG (natural immunity) after eliminating any chance of reinfection in the anti-spike antibodies (“vaccine”-induced) participants.

The British study did not insinuate or make any claims that the anti-nucleocapsid was any less protective than the anti-spike because natural immunity is the best, long-lasting protection your body can have and is used as the study’s baseline. Medicine should never be politicized, and it is a terrifying, slippery slope to be on.

Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines

In a Yale study in June of 2021 titled, Human IgG and IgA responses to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the spike antigens ability to stick around long-term showed appearance of the spike antibodies to be a red flag that indicates the possible presence of the dangerous spike protein that the “vaccines” told your body to start creating on its own so it would, in turn, develop spike antibodies to be produced to fight them.

The Yale study explained, “we measured COVID-19 mRNA vaccine induced IgG and IgA in serum serially, up to 145 days post vaccination in 4 subjects.

Spike antigen-specific IgG levels rose exponentially and plateaued 21 days after the initial vaccine dose.

After the second vaccine dose IgG levels increased further, reaching a maximum approximately 7–10 days later, and remained elevated (average of 58% peak levels) during the additional >100 day follow up period.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccination elicited spike antigen-specific IgA with similar kinetics of induction and time to peak levels, but more rapid decline in serum levels following both the 1st and 2nd vaccine doses (<18% peak levels within 100 days of the 2nd shot).

The data demonstrate COVID-19 mRNA vaccines effectively induce spike antigen specific IgG and IgA and highlight marked differences in their persistence in serum.

Red Cross Polices

The American Red Cross has “no retirements to collect and share information on the donor’s vaccination status because vaccines do not pose risks to patients.” They continue to admit, “blood products are never labeled with such information.”

Naturally, if the blood products are not labeled as to the vaccination status of the blood donor, the hospitals will be unable to provide any patients with information pertaining to whether the blood was donated by a vaccinated individual or not.

Surprisingly, the American Red Cross advises potential blood donors in their eligibility guidelines to declare there to be “no deferral time for eligible blood donors who are vaccinated, ” meaning there is no recommended wait time between getting injected and donating blood.

Ultimately, there is no way for the person receiving a transfusion to know if they will or have received tainted blood, no way to request a preference, and no methods in place to ensure the purity or safety of the donor blood, relative to COVID-19.

Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee [JPAC]

On the contrary, the transfusion guidelines in the UK, according to the Joint United Kingdom (UK) Blood Transfusion and Tissue Transplantation Services Professional Advisory Committee [JPAC], demand the donors wait at least a week after receiving an mRNA “vaccine” [i.e., Pfizer/Moderna] and two weeks after a viral-vector “vaccine” [i.e., Johnson & Johnson].

How are Antibodies Tested?

The spike protein antibodies [s antibodies] are constantly being discussed in relation to immunity against COVID-19; however, through researching this topic, I’ve discovered they aren’t the same antibody as the nucleocapsid antibodies [n antibodies] that our bodies formulate upon battling the disease from SARS-CoV-2, when encountered in nature.

Why, when using Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay [ECLIA], do we only look for N antibodies (infection-induced), considered “higher affinity antibodies…more likely to be specific for SARS-CoV-2 N protein?”

As I stated earlier, the N antibodies only come from having experienced the natural occurring illness of COVID-19. In contrast, the folks who were injected with the so-called “vaccines” only have the S antibodies.

UNC School of Medicine’s Receptor-Binding Domain [RBD] Antibody Test

In a study published by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine in Science Immunology they said, “The receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients.”

Immunodominance is the immunological phenomenon in which immune responses are mounted against only a few of the antigenic peptides out of the many produced.

Their novel SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG test is an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) intended for the qualitative detection of IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in human serum.

Illustration of the human antibody latching onto the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. [UNC School of Medicine]

UNC School of Medicine scientists and colleagues developed a new kind of antibody test – a simplified experimental assay that could be ramped up to test thousands of blood samples at labs that do not have the resources of commercial labs and large academic medical centers.

The researchers, who published their work in Science Immunology, created a blood test to pinpoint SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that target one unique piece of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. That piece is called a receptor binding domain, or RBD. Their RBD-based antibody test can measure the levels of that domain, which they found correlate to the levels of the all-important neutralizing antibodies that provide immunity.

Our assay is extremely specific for antibodies to the virus that causes COVID-19, which is not the case for some currently available antibody tests. Our results strongly support the use of RBD-based antibody assays for population-level surveillance and as a correlate of the neutralizing antibody levels in people who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Co-senior author Aravinda de Silva, professor of microbiology and immunology and member of the UNC Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases

The RBD of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 is not shared among other known human or animal coronaviruses. Therefore, antibodies against this domain are likely to be highly specific to SARS-CoV-2, and so these antibodies reveal if an individual has been exposed to the virus that can cause COVID-19. Indeed, when the researchers tested blood collected from people exposed to other coronaviruses, none had antibodies to the RBD of SARS-CoV-2.

We are now further streamlining our test into an inexpensive assay, so that instead of the test taking four to five hours to complete, our assay could be completed in about 70 minutes without compromising quality.

First and co-senior author Prem Lakshmanane, PhD, assistant professor of microbiology and immunology at UNC

Call to Action:

  • Watch/read news from BOTH SIDES.
  • PROTECT your family and fellow Patriots
  • REFUTE misinformation
  • DO NOT fall into the Third Party trap. Remember Ross Perot is how Clinton got elected.

This is a civil war between Communism and America. There is no more Democrat vs Republican right now. America needs to be united in the party of Patriots who believe in our constitution and the inherent right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

The radical Left has thrown their hail Mary, and we need to get our heads in the game and intercept that pass before it’s too late. Whether or not you believe Orange Man Bad, The Republicans who followed President Donald J Trump are the only hope for remaining a constitutional republic.

NEVER FORGET: They are Rights enumerated to remind us and our government of our innate and indisputable liberties that are granted to us by our Creator, not our government; NEVER to be infringed or impinged upon by elected officials nor bureaucratic narcissists, ALWAYS as protection for We The People from tyranny and despotism at even the highest level of our hierarchical structure.

This page is a conservative-leaning blog that takes the facts from current events and gives objective information as well as my opinion on those facts. I am not an expert in any field, nor do I claim to give expert advice, but I will try to get you all of the evidence-based information I can find.

Published by Fiery, but Mostly Peaceful Sara

I am a patriotic mother who has a passion for researching and a knack for writing. Usually judged by my California roots and hippie lifestyle; people automatically assume I am a Liberal, but that couldn’t be further from reality. I’m a pragmatic Constitutional Conservative, and find my information from both sides of the aisle in order to get to the facts.

2 thoughts on “Study Shows Up To 85% Tainted Donor Blood Contains Spike Protein Antibodies

Share your thoughts and opinions about this article!

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights